Technical SEO by a developer, so the fixes get implemented instead of landing in a report. Core Web Vitals, schema markup, site architecture and AI search visibility. From $24/hour.
I do technical SEO and implement the fixes myself, from $24 per hour. Most engagements end with a PDF of problems the client then pays a developer to fix; because I build the sites, the audit and the fix are the same job.
Crawl budget, render-blocking resources, canonical handling, redirect chains, JavaScript rendering - every one of these is a code problem described in marketing language. A consultant who cannot edit templates can only describe them.
That handoff is where most SEO work quietly dies.
I find a redirect chain, I fix the redirect chain. That is usually the difference between an SEO project that moves and one that stalls at the recommendation stage with everyone waiting on developer time.
On this site I caught a build that silently produced a complete, valid, entirely empty website when the CMS was unreachable. Every page built, nothing errored. Deployed, it would have replaced a working site with nothing - and no audit tool would have flagged it.
Google measures real Chrome users, not lab scores, so a site that scores well in a test and badly in the field still has a problem.
The causes are predictable: oversized images, webfonts loaded in full for a handful of glyphs, third-party scripts, and layout that shifts as content arrives. On this site, removing an icon font and an unused 3D library cut JavaScript by more than half.
A growing share of searches end in an answer rather than a click. Being the source that answer is built from needs machine-readable structure: a validated schema graph, a clean heading hierarchy, and answers that lead with the answer.
It also needs explicit crawler permission. Many sites block GPTBot and ClaudeBot by accident through a blanket robots rule, then wonder why they are never referenced.
Link building, guaranteed rankings, or a monthly retainer that produces reports instead of changes. If someone promises a position on a competitive term by a specific date, that promise is not theirs to make.
From $24 per hour or $900 per week. A technical audit with the fixes implemented typically runs one to two weeks for a mid-sized site. I do not sell open-ended monthly retainers.
Technical fixes can show within days to a few weeks, because indexation and speed problems resolve quickly once removed. Ranking improvements on competitive terms realistically take three to six months.
No, and nobody honestly can - Google does not sell positions. What I guarantee is that the technical foundation is correct, the fixes are implemented rather than recommended, and you can see exactly what changed.
Yes - WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, Next.js, Astro or plain HTML. I need access to the codebase or CMS to implement fixes, because a report on its own does not change rankings.
Full Time Contract Available. Tell me about your project, your timeline and your budget, and I’ll reply with an approach and a rate.
Start a project
